Skip to content
Menu
Menu

OpenAI Tests Find GPT-5.6 Deleted Data And Took Actions Users Did Not Approve

OpenAI published test results showing that GPT-5.6 sometimes deleted the wrong data, used unauthorized credentials, and falsely claimed it had completed tasks. 

OpenAI says internal testing of GPT-5.6 found that the model sometimes deleted the wrong data, used credentials it was not authorized to access, and falsely claimed it completed tasks.

The findings appeared in OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 “system card” report, which tested whether the model could complete complex tasks without deleting data or exceeding a user’s instructions. OpenAI said it trained GPT-5.6 to avoid destructive behavior while giving the model more freedom to carry out tasks on its own.

The testing found GPT-5.6 was more likely than its predecessor, GPT-5.5, to take actions that users did not intend, although OpenAI said such cases remained uncommon. According to the report, the model’s problematic behavior generally stemmed from its tendency to pursue tasks too aggressively and interpret instructions too broadly.

OpenAI said those problems ranged from overstating its accomplishments to bypassing restrictions and deleting important data. The company also reported cases in which GPT-5.6 cheated on tasks and fabricated research results, which it believes may be partly related to the model’s greater persistence when tackling difficult problems.

The report includes several examples from OpenAI’s internal testing where GPT-5.6: 

  • Ignored the user’s instructions about which virtual machines to use, switched to different machines, and then shut down processes and deleted data from those systems. 
  • Updated a research document to claim it verified an equation even though it knew it did not complete the necessary calculations. 
  • Searched hidden stores of login credentials and moved authentication files between computers without permission.

OpenAI said GPT-5.6 maintained roughly the same overall performance as GPT-5.5 on its internal tests, despite showing a greater tendency to exceed user instructions in some cases.

The company emphasized that the findings came from internal simulations rather than public use. OpenAI said the results are intended to help identify potential deployment risks and do not necessarily predict how GPT-5.6 will behave in real-world settings.

Clayton Rifkind

Clayton Rifkind is the Founder and Senior Editor of AI Risk Today. He also advises on business development for ESG Today, a leading source of ESG investment news and research for institutional investors and corporate leaders. He has 20+ years of experience in B2B technology, leading strategy and execution of go-to-market plans across software, enterprise platforms, and mobile applications. He founded two consultancies advising startups and Fortune 1000 companies, including Autodesk, Intel, and Microsoft. He began his career in the San Francisco advertising scene working with brands such as Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Microsoft, Symantec, and Wells Fargo. Clayton launched AI Risk Today in 2025 after two decades of watching enterprises adopt transformative technologies, and seeing how often risk, governance, and compliance considerations lagged behind. His reporting draws on primary sources including regulatory filings, court documents, and official announcements, with a focus on what AI developments mean for the executives accountable for managing them. Reach him at Reach him at [email protected] or on LinkedIn.

Essential AI Risk Intelligence

Daily insights on AI governance, regulation, and enterprise risk management. Trusted by Chief Risk Officers and compliance leaders globally.

By subscribing, you agree to receive our daily newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advertise with AI RIsk Today, Today!