Skip to content
Menu
Menu

Riskonnect Survey Finds Fewer Than Half Of Companies Have Trained Employees To Judge AI Answers

Most companies now have a policy on employee AI use, but only 17% of the risk professionals surveyed feel well prepared to manage AI risks.

 

Key Takeaways

  • 46% of the risk professionals surveyed say their company trained employees to judge when to trust an AI tool’s answer and when to question it.
  • 72% say their company has a policy on how employees use AI, up from 58% last year.
  • 56% say their company is considering AI tools that can carry out tasks on their own. Of those companies, 58% haven’t assessed the risks.
  • 17% of respondents feel very prepared for AI risks.

Only 46% of risk and compliance professionals say their company has trained employees to judge when to trust an AI tool’s answer and when to question it. The figure comes from the 2026 New Generation of Risk Report, a survey of 259 professionals published by Riskonnect, a risk management software company.

Most companies now have rules for how employees use AI, but fewer than half have taught employees to tell when its answers are wrong. More than half of companies are also considering AI tools that carry out tasks themselves instead of just answering questions, and most haven’t yet assessed the risks.

More companies have AI policies, but fewer say which tools are allowed

72% of respondents say their company has a policy on how employees use AI, up from 58% last year. Only 54% say their company has clear rules on which AI tools employees can use and how. Riskonnect said the policies are “stopping at the surface.”

Training on checking AI answers trails the policies

46% say employees have been trained to judge AI answers, compared with the 72% whose company has an AI policy. Fewer still have trained every employee on AI risks. 35% say their company has done this for the risks of generative AI, up from 17% in 2023.

Most companies considering AI that acts on its own haven’t assessed the risks

27% of respondents say their company already uses AI tools that carry out tasks on their own. Another 56% say their company is considering them.

Of the companies already using these tools, 84% assessed the risks. Of the companies still considering them, 58% have not. Across all respondents, only 18% say their company has trained or briefed every employee on the risks of AI agents.

Few respondents feel very prepared for AI risks

17% of respondents say they feel very prepared to handle the risks AI brings and to oversee their company’s AI use. 62% feel somewhat prepared.

23% say their company has a plan for AI threats such as deepfakes and fraud carried out with AI. 11% say their company has a budget set aside for reducing AI risks.

The report advises companies to teach employees when to trust AI, when to challenge it, and how to check its results. “Deploying a tool isn’t the same as preparing people to use it well,” it says.

The 259 respondents work in risk, compliance, or resilience at organizations worldwide. 36% are managers, 24% are directors, 24% are analysts, specialists, or coordinators, and 15% are vice presidents or C-level executives. 37% work at companies with more than 5,000 employees. The largest groups work in financial services and government.

Clayton Rifkind

Clayton Rifkind is the Founder and Senior Editor of AI Risk Today. He also advises on business development for ESG Today, a leading source of ESG investment news and research for institutional investors and corporate leaders. He has 20+ years of experience in B2B technology, leading strategy and execution of go-to-market plans across software, enterprise platforms, and mobile applications. He founded two consultancies advising startups and Fortune 1000 companies, including Autodesk, Intel, and Microsoft. He began his career in the San Francisco advertising scene working with brands such as Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Microsoft, Symantec, and Wells Fargo. Clayton launched AI Risk Today in 2025 after two decades of watching enterprises adopt transformative technologies, and seeing how often risk, governance, and compliance considerations lagged behind. His reporting draws on primary sources including regulatory filings, court documents, and official announcements, with a focus on what AI developments mean for the executives accountable for managing them. Reach him at Reach him at [email protected] or on LinkedIn.

Essential AI Risk Intelligence

Daily insights on AI governance, regulation, and enterprise risk management. Trusted by Chief Risk Officers and compliance leaders globally.

By subscribing, you agree to receive our daily newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advertise with AI RIsk Today, Today!